Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : "Lukasz Stafiniak" <address@hidden>- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Style for pseudocode
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 15:29:03 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=JCy1eiNfZs8s5uVmCP8AnB+ggH5bZcdxxjPaAbWKP2AmbeXeEfRlaK1KsG7zltpls01GY/nU/VXadNDCjTmygaBse2i1FfWuJaNYx0bM2BgwMF+2gN/LYA8+nBWHe5U3Kgq9WzzP/cBqCMR68MI32zMw273dPaXXQifKuW9PlEY=
Hi,
Is there a standard style for pseudocode? Is anyone willing to share a
successful try? I attach my naive one. I want to export to html. The
second version does badly, the first (based on tables) does quite
well, but sometimes the boxes are unnecessarily narrow. How to enforce
that the statements <STATE| ... > are in one line in html?
Best Regards,
Lukasz Stafiniak
Attachment:
pseudocode.ts
Description: Binary data
- Style for pseudocode, Lukasz Stafiniak, 06/02/2006
- Re: [TeXmacs] Style for pseudocode, Henri Lesourd, 06/02/2006
- texmacs for literate programming (was: Re: [TeXmacs] Style for pseudocode), David MENTRE, 06/02/2006
- Re: texmacs for literate programming (was: Re: [TeXmacs] Style for pseudocode), Henri Lesourd, 06/03/2006
- texmacs for literate programming (was: Re: [TeXmacs] Style for pseudocode), David MENTRE, 06/02/2006
- Re: [TeXmacs] Style for pseudocode, Henri Lesourd, 06/02/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.