Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : Bob Lounsbury <address@hidden>- To: <address@hidden>
- Subject: Source or binary?
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:46:18 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bxVUe9ccsqRHhyPWCduGOxumCfYWrgmONotTZVAJxuqr0F+WJ/nSq4p+vbUOjPVU60CucvpNiYIxEqMGqvxX14CK7jPUB3KN5vKMOhJCSF0IEip+Fg6B11evQ9NpuSCM+IZ4dxosJ9cLEETFttrIWkIIE+8MRdDezKClq/pRbZ8=
Is it better to install the source or binary of texmacs? I want to install
it on my mac 10.2. I just want to get your opinions of the benefits or
limitations of each type.
Thank you,
Bob
- Source or binary?, Bob Lounsbury, 09/09/2006
- Re: [TeXmacs] Source or binary?, Ingolf Schäfer, 09/09/2006
- Re: [TeXmacs] Source or binary?, Martin Costabel, 09/09/2006
- Re: [TeXmacs] Source or binary?, Bob Lounsbury, 09/09/2006
- Re: [TeXmacs] Source or binary?, Martin Costabel, 09/10/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.