texmacs-users - Re: [TeXmacs] Source or binary?

Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

List archive

Re: [TeXmacs] Source or binary?

From: Ingolf Schäfer <address@hidden>
To: Bob Lounsbury <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] Source or binary?
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 10:48:02 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=F7VpWm0RefdpFCqbp/FBcr+NrejmDp7t9eXf6cSnNxWHI8NphsRPF4Y7gmLuDL5T5jjnIAtSCRYxOPSgE/i2iCBwXfsUGv1pFFkDijQRq0Y2Y/zRzsl7Gk1zE8dsTgv0dWSOOcE+JHwYMT9KWl15sCwaWT3m9lIMtTlws2wvXAI=

Am 09.09.2006 um 05:46 schrieb Bob Lounsbury:

Is it better to install the source or binary of texmacs? I want to install
it on my mac 10.2. I just want to get your opinions of the benefits or
limitations of each type.

If you are using Fink you we in either case have an older version of TeXmacs. Try the binary first, if you like TeXmacs than you should be able to compile your own version of the most recent version with some help.

I have no access to a Mac OS X 10.2 machine any more, so I cannot help you more explicitly.

Yours,

Ingolf

Thank you,
Bob

Source or binary?, Bob Lounsbury, 09/09/2006
- Re: [TeXmacs] Source or binary?, Ingolf Schäfer, 09/09/2006
- Re: [TeXmacs] Source or binary?, Martin Costabel, 09/09/2006
  - Re: [TeXmacs] Source or binary?, Bob Lounsbury, 09/09/2006
  - Re: [TeXmacs] Source or binary?, Martin Costabel, 09/10/2006

List archive

Re: [TeXmacs] Source or binary?