Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : Robert Ransom <address@hidden>- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] Discrepancies between TeXmacs versions
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:14:26 -0700
Robert Lamar wrote:
My research group has a TeXmacs plugin which was originally developed under Fedora 5 with TeXmacs 1.0.6.7. After upgrading to Fedora 7, it ceased to work properly. The main symptom is this: the plugin passes data back to TeXmacs which should look like this:
... (tuple 12 "") (tuple 13 "") ...
But under certain installations, TeXmacs **reports** [emphasis added] receiving data looking like this:
... (tuple #{12}# "") (tuple #{13}# "") ...
Is this the raw text sent to TeXmacs, or was this read as a Scheme datum (using the version of the Guile parser TeXmacs was linked to) and then displayed? The TeXmacs binary provided by Fedora 7 is dynamically linked to the distribution's version of Guile, while a statically linked TeXmacs binary would include the version of Guile installed on the computer on which it was compiled, possibly with a different parser.
Robert Ransom
- Discrepancies between TeXmacs versions, Robert Lamar, 03/12/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] Discrepancies between TeXmacs versions, Robert Ransom, 03/13/2008
- RE: [TeXmacs] Discrepancies between TeXmacs versions, Lamar, Robert, 03/13/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] Discrepancies between TeXmacs versions, Robert Ransom, 03/13/2008
- RE: [TeXmacs] Discrepancies between TeXmacs versions, Andrey G. Grozin, 03/13/2008
- RE: [TeXmacs] Discrepancies between TeXmacs versions, Lamar, Robert, 03/13/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] Discrepancies between TeXmacs versions, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/13/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] Discrepancies between TeXmacs versions, Robert Ransom, 03/13/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.