The forum (http://forum.texmacs.cn/) is intended to be the "official" place to discuss Texmacs?I think it is much better than the emailing list. Unfortunately the emailing list still looks much more active than the forum.On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:47 PM Giovanni Piredda <address@hidden> wrote:
Am 03.09.2019 um 23:45 schrieb Amir Michail:
>
>> On Sep 3, 2019, at 5:36 PM, Giovanni Piredda <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 03.09.2019 um 17:00 schrieb Massimiliano Gubinelli:
>>> I just noted that the proposal has been deleted from area51. I didn’t get any notification of that, but maybe it means that there were not much activity…
>>>
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Max
>>>
>> The proposal has been closed after four months from its start, as it did not reach the minimum number of upvoted questions; now it has been also deleted. In case it had been succesful at the first phase ("Definition"), the following phase would have been harder I think as the "committed users" must have a minimum "StackExchange reputation", and to get that takes a substantial amount of work which may be very unwelcome for many people.
>>
>> As I see it now, a nice and functional forum at http://forum.texmacs.cn/ can be a strong asset for TeXmacs.
>>
> Why not just use the TeXmacs subreddit?
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/texmacs/
>
> Amir
IMHO it does not have the nice organization of the forum at
http://forum.texmacs.cn/
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.