Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hi Vincent,

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 05:14:19PM +0100, Massimiliano Gubinelli wrote:
> I'm not sure that the fact that it appears there means that it is
> recognized. Try with a fake package name, like "vinz" :)
>
> Only some latex packages have TeXmacs "doppelganger", so you should not
> expect to be able to use any package you like.
> As Giovanni says, if you need specific unicode symbols then provided the
> font you use supports them you can always add them as he suggest by
> defining a macro.
>
> Of course it would be useful to have packages of common symbols, but I do
> not know if it already exists, one would have to give a look at the
> TeXmacs/packages to see if something interesting pops out.

If you need some fancy Unicode symbol, then the simplest solution is
to use a standard font that supports the symbol and write it using that font.
If you frequently use the symbol, then you may define a macro.

But TeXmacs has native support for the overwhelming majority of useful
mathematical symbols.
Typical symbols that might be lacking are dingbat symbols, smileys, exotic
languages, etc.

Best wishes, --Joris

---

• paquetages LaTeX, Vincent Douce Mathoscope, 01/20/2021
  • Re: paquetages LaTeX, Giovanni Piredda, 01/21/2021
  • Re: paquetages LaTeX, Massimiliano Gubinelli, 01/21/2021
    • Re: paquetages LaTeX, TeXmacs, 01/21/2021
  • Re: paquetages LaTeX, Massimiliano Gubinelli, 01/21/2021

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.