- From: Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>
- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm
- Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 11:23:27 +0100 (MET)
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, Andrey G. Grozin wrote:
>
Hi *,
>
>
> > However, I agree with Jay that the 'd' after the integrand should be in
>
> > roman
>
> > font. I do not know what is typographically correct, that is just my
>
> > two
>
> > cents.
>
> This opinion can indeed be defended, but it is not the current
>
> typographical tradition.
>
>
Some publishers (e.g., Springer-Verlag) require exactly this: d in
>
integrals and derivatives, i (the imaginary unit), e (exp(1)) *must* be in
>
roman.
I know, especially for i and e (maybe I should create macros \i, \e and \d);
this happened to me for one paper (published by Elsevier).
However, a few weeks ago, a friend of mine made the same remark and
I have looked at a few dozen of books from different publishers in
my personal library; none of them used this convention.
-Joris-
-----------------------------------------------------------
Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>
http://www.texmacs.org: GNU TeXmacs scientific text editor
http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~vdhoeven: personal homepage
-----------------------------------------------------------
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.