Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

> > Some publishers (e.g., Springer-Verlag) require exactly this: d in
> > integrals and derivatives, i (the imaginary unit), e (exp(1)) *must* be in
> > roman.
> I know, especially for i and e (maybe I should create macros \i, \e and \d);
> this happened to me for one paper (published by Elsevier).
> However, a few weeks ago, a friend of mine made the same remark and
> I have looked at a few dozen of books from different publishers in
> my personal library; none of them used this convention.
I'm now writing a book for Springer-Verlag. They absolutely insist on this
convention. Their LaTeX style contains macros \D, \I, \E for this.

Andrey

---

• \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Daniel Duparc, 03/01/2002
  • Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Jay Belanger, 03/01/2002
    • Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/01/2002
      • Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, David Allouche, 03/01/2002
        • Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/01/2002
          • Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Andrey G. Grozin, 03/02/2002
            • Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/02/2002
              • Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Andrey G. Grozin, 03/02/2002
              • Convention for products and operators--, Álvaro Tejero Cantero, 03/02/2002
              • Re: Convention for products and operators--, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/02/2002
              • Wiki, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/02/2002
      • Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Michael John Downes, 03/04/2002
        • Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/04/2002

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.