Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:31:26AM +0200, Nicolas Ratier wrote:

>> a _separate_ "CUA/Windows" keybinding style would make you even happier?

> That a good solution, I use TeXmacs under Suse/KDE, for memory the
> following keys are the standard shortcut key bindings included in
> the KDE distribution.

Of CUA/Windowsy inspiration and in total break with any kind of Unixy
inspiration. How these people can claim they are developing a Desktop
for Unix with a straight face is beyond me.

<troll mood="rant">
One of the reasons I tend not to use KDE apps (and tend to dislike
Gnome apps more and more).
</troll>

> How many people would like to use these keys with TeXmacs ?

<troll mood="excessively aggressive and insulting">
One.
</troll>

> KDE Standard Key Bindings

And how do you remap the TeXmacs keybindings that conflict with it? Do
you completely rehaul the keybindings, so you have an "internal
consistency" or do you remap just those that conflict?

--
Lionel

---

• [TeXmacs] C-x, C-c, C-v, Nicolas Ratier, 10/19/2004
  • Re: [TeXmacs] C-x, C-c, C-v, Lionel Elie Mamane, 10/19/2004
    • Re: [TeXmacs] C-x, C-c, C-v, Nicolas Ratier, 10/20/2004
      • Re: [TeXmacs] C-x, C-c, C-v, Lionel Elie Mamane, 10/20/2004
        • Re: [TeXmacs] C-x, C-c, C-v, Mark Arrasmith, 10/20/2004
          • Re: [TeXmacs] C-x, C-c, C-v, Nachiketa Sahoo, 10/20/2004
          • [OT] Of Ease of Use and World Domination, Lionel Elie Mamane, 10/20/2004
            • Re: [TeXmacs] [OT] Of Ease of Use and World Domination, Joris van der Hoeven, 10/20/2004
              • C-e and end of line, Lionel Elie Mamane, 10/20/2004
              • Re: [TeXmacs] C-e and end of line, Karl Hegbloom, 10/24/2004
    • Re: [TeXmacs] C-x, C-c, C-v, Joris van der Hoeven, 10/20/2004

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.