Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : Jan Ulrich Hasecke <address@hidden>- To: Javier Arantegui <address@hidden>
- Cc: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: Realase dates and pdf
- Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 11:24:09 +0100
Javier Arantegui <address@hidden> writes:
> "The standard TeX fonts are Computer Modern Fonts. By default, dvips
> creates PS files that use bitmap Computer Modern Fonts. Such a PS file
> looks fine in print, but looks ugly on screen. The reason is that
> bitmap fonts are used instead of Adobe Type 1 outline fonts (like the
> Apple/Microsoft TrueType fonts).
>
> When such a PS file is converted to a PDF file, the resluting PDF file
> will have the same problem -- poor display quality on screen, but good
> quality in print. The reason is that, bitmap fonts are converted to
> Adobe Type 3 fonts in converting to PDF, and Acrobat displays Type 3
> fonts in very poor quality on screen. "
Is it possible to use ae-fonts or cm-super-fonts in TeXmacs?
I wrote a book with ae-fonts and emacs/pdflatex which looks nice in
print and on screen.
Ciao!
juh
--
Schlachtet die Unschuldslämmer!
http://www.sudelbuch.de/2001/20010206.html
- Realase dates and pdf, Javier Arantegui, 11/07/2002
- Re: Realase dates and pdf, Jan Ulrich Hasecke, 11/07/2002
- Re: Realase dates and pdf, David Allouche, 11/07/2002
- Re: Realase dates and pdf, Javier Arantegui, 11/08/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Realase dates and pdf, Juan Pablo Romero, 11/07/2002
- Re: Realase dates and pdf, offray . luna, 11/10/2002
- Re: Realase dates and pdf, Joris van der Hoeven, 11/10/2002
- Re: Realase dates and pdf, offray . luna, 11/14/2002
- Re: Realase dates and pdf, offray . luna, 11/18/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.