mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

["address@hidden" <address@hidden>]

Hi,

i use both versions : unstable on ubuntu and experimental on etch (my
main OS).

I do really think seeing version 1.6.0.10 in unstable would be a great
thing.

Good luck and thank you for your work

MLL

Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 04:42 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi a écrit :
> Hi
> 
>     I am currently part of the maintenance team of texmacs in Debian. I
> would like to get some feedback from Debian users using Texmacs and from
> the developers of texmacs. Previously, all the 4 digit versions of texmacs
> (ex:- 1.0.6.9) used to be uploaded to 'Debian experimental' and 3 digit
> versions (ex:- 1.0.6) are uploaded to 'Debian unstable'. The idea is that
> the 4 digit versions of texmacs are very unstable compared to the 3 digit
> versions.
> 
>     However, texmacs has been taking a long time to release 1.0.7. Besides,
> packages in debian experimental does not get that much tested as do
> packages in debian unstable.
> 
>     So do Debian users like to see Texmacs versions such as 1.0.6.10 in
> unstable? What do the developers think? Are the 4 digit versions so
> immature that they fail to compile etc.,? or are they reasonably usable?
> 
> Any opinions/suggestions would be very welcome. Especially if you are a long
> term texmacs+Debian user.
> 
> thanks
> raju
>