mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <address@hidden>]

Karl Hegbloom wrote:

> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 04:42 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>>     So do Debian users like to see Texmacs versions such as 1.0.6.10 in
>> unstable? What do the developers think? Are the 4 digit versions so
>> immature that they fail to compile etc.,? or are they reasonably usable?
>> 
>> Any opinions/suggestions would be very welcome. Especially if you are a
>> long term texmacs+Debian user.
> 
> I would like to see the 4 digit versions for certain, even if it means
> adding an unofficial repository to sources.list.
> 

The idea is whether to put the 4 digit version in unstable or continue
providing it in experimental. So the question of unofficial repository most
likely does not arise :-) But if push comes to shove, that can also be
arranged.

> Do you use revision control for the debian/ directory?  If so, then
> perhaps you can keep a branch for the current stable release, and
> maintain the head revision for the current pre-release (4 digit) version
> of TeXmacs.

Ok. Currently debian/ directory is not under revision control. I will think
about this. Thanks for the suggestion.

raju

-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/