Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : "Bob Lounsbury" <address@hidden>- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] TeX distribution?
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 23:28:24 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=a3vJYcTQQE9+Wu1CAZ270CqcGNupvFd8O/QP5qW774ggf9fsUNDOYLJj/Pm3h3fQAU+ekL6cd8l8nUkAPXdY2+HkCSk3BE5LkbbJNIi0HVUWJ4gR1d7sVlyzkC+D5ccMGd0QuxbgjR7ql50N4B+WVDwRKjnkiZyFKU9whO9uBCs=
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 11:01 PM, RyanC <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was about to install TeXmacs for the first time since switching Linux
> distros. But Synaptic wanted to resolve the dependencies with teTeX and
> remove the newer TeX Live. I don't usually ignore dependencies or force
> installs. What to do?
>
> Kind regards,
> Ryan
>
I was just considering this myself. Because I also use LyX which
Debian has resolved to be compatible with either texlive or tetex.
However, as you've stated texmacs depends on tetex and will uninstall
texlive in Debian. Although, I was just thinking ... tetex provides
everything I need. So, why worry about? I'm just going to install
tetex with LyX and texmacs and not worry about it. Probably in the
next Debian stable release it will all be changed anyway.
Cheers,
/Bob
- TeX distribution?, RyanC, 06/01/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] TeX distribution?, Bob Lounsbury, 06/01/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] TeX distribution?, RyanC, 06/01/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] TeX distribution?, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, 06/01/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] TeX distribution?, Bob Lounsbury, 06/01/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] TeX distribution?, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, 06/01/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] TeX distribution?, Bob Lounsbury, 06/01/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] TeX distribution?, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, 06/01/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] TeX distribution?, RyanC, 06/02/2008
- Re: [TeXmacs] TeX distribution?, Bob Lounsbury, 06/01/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.