Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

texmacs-users - Re: [TeXmacs] Fusion of environments

Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

List archive

Re: [TeXmacs] Fusion of environments


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Alvaro Tejero Cantero <address@hidden>
  • To: address@hidden
  • Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] Fusion of environments
  • Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:17:54 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=RToJHnAPzqVlmH51WwlBrrYc+supLKDNaOkrIRti0reZRKLCUqkJDyITxF2MV4EPPa FKRazt/1MBbMGcHvyYAClwnjwpUZ4DawTLHGA7C4IQKTFPSgRf5/aY2ZDX/kAB2t0P4p ym7Z5fbKjwawObG/8NyvYykoMOQICR/+XrU24=

> If your verbatim environment is alone on a line,
> then this behaviour conflicts with the natural behaviour of
> inserting a new line.

In 99% of the cases putting a verbatim environment alone on a line +
then inserting multiple lines is useless (shouldn't you use \code for
that?). In fact inserting a new line is maybe what should be done by
S-Return, to be uniform with the behavior in lists.

> Maybe 'return' is a bit too simple a shortcut for exiting.

I agree that return is problematic because of the user expectations,
but these are mainly on the main text (in mathematics it is OK to use
return for exit)

But this difficulty shouldn't stop us from finding something better
than the right arrow which is really hard to find.

A possibility would be Right Shift + Return to exit on the right side
and Left Shift + Return to exit on the left side. I could live with
that: both keys are big, accesible and have a predictable location on
most keyboards.

Ideas from others welcome!

Álvaro.


>
> Best wishes, --Joris
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page