- From: François Poulain <address@hidden>
- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:25:34 +0000
Hi,
Some points.
Le Thu, 1 Mar 2012 19:30:55 +0000,
Alvaro Tejero Cantero <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
! What would you like to happen with TeXmacs?
>
* three most important point
>
* then summarize in just one
* Annotation capabilities (a way to discuss about content without
altering it, identifying contributions, and putting on foreground
the parts of the document which are the most discussed).
* Collaborative multi-hand writing. This could also be a way for a
teacher to monitor some CAS activities done by its students.
* CLI user interface, allowing basic capabilities : conversion,
scheme script launching, etc.
>
! What are the most important bugs?
>
* three bugs
>
* one bug
The LaTeX converter is very buggy. :)
>
! What would be best for TeXmacs to become adopted?
>
* three points
>
* one point
The name best name to become adopted ?
I think the current name is confusing.
I am not convinced that :
* a new name should obligatorily contains tm ;
* a new name should obligatorily be explicit on what TeXmacs is, and
what TeXmacs is not.
But it should remains easy and quick to pronounce.
Suggestions : tomath (as tomato, in french), scilex (as scientific
editor blah blah ...).
>
! How to organize TeXmacs as a community
>
* three points
>
* one point
* This can be done via regular events (barcamps, learning sessions, bug
squashing parties, sprints, etc.) ;
* via online organisation (mailling lists, IRC channel, Forum, Shapado,
etc.).
>
! What kind of documentation would you like to see more?
>
* three points
>
* one point
* On-line question.texmacs.org, with a kind of Shapado software.
* Shorts and simple demos/tutorial videos (1 min max).
* Interactive tutorial.
* An offline book, as Every Thing You Always Wanted to Know About
TeXmacs But Were Afraid to Ask.
>
! How should TeXmacs be publicized
>
* Name change (or not): three suggestions and one suggestion
>
* New website, new general graphical design (logo?).
* The web site and the graphical logo could be improve but I do not
think it is mandatory.
* I think that the interoperability of TeXmacs should be improved.
* I think TeXmacs should be promoted from scientists and scholars.
>
! What do you think you could contribute?
>
* three points
>
* one point
Improving converters.
François
--
François Poulain <address@hidden>
Le manque d'intimité entre amis est un défaut que l'on ne peut blâmer
sans le rendre inguérissable.
-+- Friedrich Nietzsche, Humain, trop humain -+-
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, (continued)
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, François-Xavier Thomas, 03/01/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Peter Rapčan, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Pablo S . Casas, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Peter Rapčan, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Peter Rapčan, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Jan Lellmann, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Sam Liddicott, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Lukasz Stafiniak, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, François Poulain, 03/02/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.