mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

Text archives Help


Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs


Chronological Thread 
  • From: François-Xavier Thomas <address@hidden>
  • To: address@hidden
  • Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs
  • Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:25:59 +0100
  • Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of address@hidden designates 10.101.6.23 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=address@hidden; dkim=pass header.i=address@hidden

Just thought of something else : it would be really cool to have the
ability to add words to the aspell dictionary!

Have a nice day!

On 3/2/12, Henri Girard <address@hidden> wrote:
> Why change the name ? It's one of the only soft we get at first research
> : put texmacs in google and you get it !
> For example : maxima sage axiom are damned name :)
> In google you never get the right soft with those names !
> How stressing it can be for example to look for RLC maxima axiom ....
> They bring you anything but right search !
> tex is fine in texmacs so we know what is about !
> I am not an expert in texmacs that why I like it, to write maths physics
> it comes near "naturally" and that 's what i expect from a wisiwig other
> wise I would choose another none wisiwig latex things !
> I am translating and making some articles with texmacs (translation too)
> though I believe most people using texmacs speak english ?
> well thanks again to all those who are making such an excellent soft :)
> I use it on linux.
> regards
> Henri
>
> Le 02/03/2012 00:41, Peter Rapčan a écrit :
>> Supplemental: If you really want to change texmacs' name (to get rid of
>> the tex connotation), I vote for TeXmacs -> TechMax.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter.
>>
>> On Mar 1, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Alvaro Tejero Cantero wrote:
>>
>>> Dear TeXmacs users,
>>>
>>> Tomorrow is the final day of the TeXmacs workshop.
>>>
>>> A few important issues will be discussed in a dedicated session. Joris
>>> has put forward a questionnaire to guide the discussion. To sample the
>>> wishes, interests and ideas of TeXmacs users we would welcome the
>>> opinion of all of you who could not make it to Faro.
>>>
>>> Here are the questions*:
>>>
>>> ! What would you like to happen with TeXmacs?
>>> * three most important point
>>> * then summarize in just one
>>>
>>> ! What are the most important bugs?
>>> * three bugs
>>> * one bug
>>>
>>> ! What would be best for TeXmacs to become adopted?
>>> * three points
>>> * one point
>>>
>>> ! How to organize TeXmacs as a community
>>> * three points
>>> * one point
>>>
>>> ! What kind of documentation would you like to see more?
>>> * three points
>>> * one point
>>>
>>> ! How should TeXmacs be publicized
>>> * Name change (or not): three suggestions and one suggestion
>>> * New website, new general graphical design (logo?).
>>>
>>> ! What do you think you could contribute?
>>> * three points
>>> * one point
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Álvaro Tejero Cantero.
>>>
>>> * whoever is interested in looking at the names that have been
>>> proposed already please make yourself a user in http://tiddlyspace.com
>>> and send to me privately the id so that I can authorize you to see the
>>> private pages in http://tamiz.tiddlyspace.com. You can suggest new
>>> names; in that case using the letters 't' and 'm' is of interest to
>>> ease the transition process.
>
>


--
*François-Xavier Thomas*
Élève ingénieur à Télécom ParisTech



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of page