Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : TeXmacs <address@hidden>- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:59:04 +0100
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:20:51AM +0100, Massimiliano Gubinelli wrote:
> I do not think TeXmacs need a lot of users. It needs *good users*, *smart
> users*, *users which want to spend some time contributing to the project in
> some way*, *users that are willing to help improving the program*.
I do not agree. We need users of both types.
And the more users we have, the more smart users will join.
But I am not convinced by Amir's strategy to achieve that goal.
Sticking too close to LaTeX maintains the widespread confusion that
we are just a LaTeX front-end. I think that it is interesting to
highlight features where TeXmacs is substantially different and better,
and to make this part of the learning process as early as possible.
Best wishes, --Joris
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Massimiliano Gubinelli, 12/01/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Amir Michail, 12/01/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Massimiliano Gubinelli, 12/01/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, TeXmacs, 12/01/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Frank, 12/01/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, TeXmacs, 12/01/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Frank, 12/01/2020
- Message not available
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Darcy Shen, 12/05/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Amir Michail, 12/01/2020
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Darcy Shen, 12/05/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.