Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : TeXmacs <address@hidden>- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:14:02 +0100
Hi Frank,
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 06:09:56PM +0100, Frank wrote:
> On the other hand, I would like to avoid terms like "smart users" which
> might hint that other users are intelligently disabled, and in this
> context, it would suggest that some users be too stupid to use or to
> contribute to TeXmacs, which seems extremely unfriendly and arrogant.
There are many users of TeXmacs for who LaTeX is way to sophisticated
and user-unfriendly. That is precisely why these users like TeXmacs.
I don't think that these users will contribute to the development of TeXmacs,
but they are often very fine people. I definitely wrote TeXmacs also for
them.
Best wishes, --Joris
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Massimiliano Gubinelli, 12/01/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Amir Michail, 12/01/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Massimiliano Gubinelli, 12/01/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, TeXmacs, 12/01/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Frank, 12/01/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, TeXmacs, 12/01/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Frank, 12/01/2020
- Message not available
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Darcy Shen, 12/05/2020
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Amir Michail, 12/01/2020
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Why not have "adaptive" TeXmacs manual for LaTeX users?, Darcy Shen, 12/05/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.